Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaK2VnJWE34Rp_eBwKc95Ff5fCoU_3hz9H_a6g3fQmj0w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Non-superuser subscription owners ("houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Non-superuser subscription owners
Re: Non-superuser subscription owners |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:49 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > It looks like the super user check is out of a transaction, I haven't checked why > it only failed on one BF animal, but it seems we can put the check into the > transaction like the following: That looks like a reasonable fix but I can't reproduce the problem locally. I thought the reason why that machine sees the problem might be that it uses -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, but I tried that option here and the tests still pass. Anyone ideas how to reproduce? -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: