Re: Non-superuser subscription owners

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoaK2VnJWE34Rp_eBwKc95Ff5fCoU_3hz9H_a6g3fQmj0w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на RE: Non-superuser subscription owners  ("houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
Ответы RE: Non-superuser subscription owners  ("houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
Re: Non-superuser subscription owners  (Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:49 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
<houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> It looks like the super user check is out of a transaction, I haven't checked why
> it only failed on one BF animal, but it seems we can put the check into the
> transaction like the following:

That looks like a reasonable fix but I can't reproduce the problem
locally. I thought the reason why that machine sees the problem might
be that it uses -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, but I tried that option here
and the tests still pass. Anyone ideas how to reproduce?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Следующее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests