Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaJR+qToFNWg5qqmA_FcBiEEWX_pKHKBCJg7h7RnWZc6A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 02:04:00PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >> > Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> writes: >> >> From the manual: >> >> "An unnamed portal is destroyed at the end of the transaction" >> > >> > Actually, all portals are destroyed at end of transaction (unless >> > they're from holdable cursors). Named or not doesn't enter into it. >> >> We need to fix the document then. > > I looked into this. The text reads: > > If successfully created, a named prepared-statement object lasts till > the end of the current session, unless explicitly destroyed. An unnamed > prepared statement lasts only until the next Parse statement specifying > the unnamed statement as destination is issued. > > While the first statement does say "named", the next sentence says > "unnamed", so I am not sure we can make this any clearer. I'm not sure what this has to do with the previous topic. Aren't a prepared statement and a portal two different things? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: