Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaH5K5W1V+FbtwJNY-YjBeZchgbKK8VpFtbGr649T-RRg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:20 PM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > But it seems I've misinterpreted what he was saying. He doesn't seem to > be saying anything about how or whether we enforce the unique constraint > on foreign tables. Only that if someone creates a constraint index on the > partitioned table, all partitions *including* foreign partitions, must get > a copy. Honestly, I hadn't quite gotten that far in my thinking. That's a really useful distinction, and I completely agree with it. > So for now, we give users an error if they try to create an index on a > partitioned table with a mix of local and foreign partitions. Once we > figure out how to allow creating indexes (constraint-enforcing or not) on > foreign tables, we can then think of relaxing that restriction. Yeah, that sounds exactly right. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: