Re: Functions used in index definitions shouldn't be changed
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Functions used in index definitions shouldn't be changed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaGXzNeh08SOR13A3=sNyR135rREPmxXB-wStcjnCi6hQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Functions used in index definitions shouldn't be changed (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Functions used in index definitions shouldn't be changed
Re: Functions used in index definitions shouldn't be changed |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote: > I don't think that there is a universally compelling right or wrong to > questions like this, it is more a matter of taste. Is it more important to protect > the casual DBA from hurting himself or herself, or is it more important to > provide a well honed scalpel for the experienced surgeon? +1. I think if we had an already-existing prohibition here and you proposed relaxing it, the howls would be equally loud. We're not entirely consistent about how picky we are. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: