Re: replay pause vs. standby promotion
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: replay pause vs. standby promotion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaGPfadfMX_-BK+=8n4iL+RaMGKx5dcFX8dO+Szh2gR2g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: replay pause vs. standby promotion (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: replay pause vs. standby promotion
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:36 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > If we would like to have the promotion method to finish recovery > immediately, IMO we should implement something like > "pg_ctl promote -m fast". That is, we need to add new method into > the promotion. I think 'immediate' would be a better choice. One reason is that we've used the term 'fast promotion' in the past for a different feature. Another is that 'immediate' might sound slightly scary to people who are familiar with what 'pg_ctl stop -mimmediate' does. And you want people doing this to be just a little bit scared: not too scared, but a little scared. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: