Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaG06D3tGUC+Xq_tjfTa6ZkTBL_yBq8tystTWYxWZjmGg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:37 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Thanks. I think now we can proceed with >>> fix_accum_instr_parallel_workers_v8.patch posted above which will fix >>> the original issue and the problem we have found in sort and hash >>> nodes. >> >> Committed and back-patched to v10. > > Thanks and attached find the rebased version that can be applied to > v9.6. I have to change the test case to produce a stable output and > the reason for the change is that 9.6 doesn't have 'summary off' > option for Explain. This thread got lost in my inbox over Christmas, but I've now committed this back-port to REL9_6_STABLE. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: