Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaF57QK13vci5=f2BzS6TTO8hhHv+ByFFPM29yLoojXCQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > I'm actually rather unconvinced that it's all that common that all > subtransactions are on one page. If you have concurrency - otherwise > there'd be not much point in this patch - they'll usually be heavily > interleaved, no? You can argue that you don't care about subxacts, > because they're more often used in less concurrent scenarios, but if > that's the argument, it should actually be made. But a single clog page holds a lot of transactions - I think it's ~32k. If you have 100 backends running, and each one allocates an XID in turn, and then each allocates a sub-XID in turn, and then they all commit, and then you repeat this pattern, >99% of transactions will be on a single CLOG page. And that is a pretty pathological case. It's true that if you have many short-running transactions interleaved with occasional long-running transactions, and the latter use subxacts, the optimization might fail to apply to the long-running subxacts fairly often. But who cares? Those are, by definition, a small percentage of the overall transaction stream. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: