Re: additional json functionality

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I am sure you could also devise an json encoding scheme
> where white space is significant ;)

I don't even have to think hard.  If you want your JSON to be
human-readable, it's entirely possible that you want it stored using
the same whitespace that was present on input.  There is a valid use
case for normalizing whitespace, too, of course.

Everyone on this thread who thinks that there is Only One Right Way To
Do It should take a chill pill.  There is, in fact, more than one
right way to do it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company