Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 7)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 7) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaDtzTC02gx2E_w1mh7eAaaJ_ONJadu0AQGUrgSMou8Kw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 7) (Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 7)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com> wrote:
During this week, I read documentation and source code of BRIN index to understand its implementation.
But later I found out that it is unlikely to implement page level or tuple level predicate locking in BRIN index.
In this week, I also fixed a small issue and updated my previous patch for gin index. Currently, I am working onsp-gist index.
It's a shame that nobody seems to be answering emails like this, but you also haven't provided much detail here - e.g. *why* is BRIN unlikely to work out well? I think I know the answer, but it'd be good to spell out your thoughts on the subject, I think.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: