counting pallocs
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | counting pallocs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaC86O27z9D+5VcK5GhJu_eR9bYm_mse+zuic7UVyAxEA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: counting pallocs
Re: counting pallocs |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The attached patch provides some rough instrumentation for determining where palloc calls are coming from. This is obviously just for noodling around with, not for commit, and there may well be bugs. But enjoy. I gave this a quick spin on a couple of test workloads: a very short pgbench test, a very short pgbench -S test, and the regression tests. On the pgbench test, the top culprits are ExecInitExpr() and expression_tree_mutator(); in both cases, the lappend() call for the T_List case is the major contributor. Other significant contributors include _copyVar(), which I haven't drilled into terribly far but seems to be coming mostly from add_vars_to_targetlist(); buildRelationAliases() via lappend, pstrdup, and makeString; ExecAllocTupleTableSlot(); and makeColumnRef() via makeNode, lcons, and makeString. The pgbench -S results are similar, but build_physical_tlist() also pops up fairly high. On the regression tests, heap_tuple_untoast_attr() is at the very top of the list, and specifically for the VARATT_IS_SHORT() case. It might be good to disaggregate this some more, but I'm too tired for that right now. index_form_tuple()'s palloc0 call comes in second, and heap_form_minimal_tuple()'s palloc0 is third. LockAcquireExtended()'s allocation of a new LOCALLOCK entry also comes in prettyhigh; ExecInitExpr() shows up here too; and heap_form_tuple() shows up as well. One piece of reasonably low-hanging fruit appears to be OpExpr. It seems like it would be better all around to put Node *arg1 and Node *arg2 in there instead of a list... aside from saving pallocs, it seems like it would generally simplify the code. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: