Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaANB5py=f6Fbx4SUJFK_ZuNKmNWch+38D_QW1i_+sjDw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication,
cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.
Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > In my days of Perl, it was starting to become frowned upon to call > subroutines without parenthesizing arguments. Is that no longer the > case? Because I notice there are many places in this patch and pre- > existing that call psql with an argument list without parens. And it's > a bit odd because I couldn't find any other subroutine that we're using > in that way. I've been coding in Perl for more than 20 years and have never heard of such a rule. Maybe I am not part of the "in" crowd. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: