Re: Refactoring backend fork+exec code
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Refactoring backend fork+exec code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoa=m3qogg1QH8kbicTgCtipgK1hTUDWpHd5SBra7kV6Ew@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Refactoring backend fork+exec code (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Refactoring backend fork+exec code
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 3:07 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > I think the last remaining question here is about the 0- vs 1-based indexing > > of BackendIds. Is it a good idea to switch to 0-based indexing? And if we do > > it, should we reserve PGPROC 0. I'm on the fence on this one. > > I lean towards it being a good idea. Having two internal indexing schemes was > bad enough so far, but at least one would fairly quickly notice if one used > the wrong one. If they're just offset by 1, it might end up taking longer, > because that'll often also be a valid id. Yeah, I think making everything 0-based is probably the best way forward long term. It might require more cleanup work to get there, but it's just a lot simpler in the end, IMHO. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: