Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoa9G20=4=wZ3ai8GrrJhYhoGbqqCsJkKJbv8YpLth5VCg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 1:13 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: > I do wonder if users find the differences between predefined roles and role > attributes confusing. INHERIT doesn't govern role attributes, but it will > govern predefined roles when this patch is applied. Maybe the role > attribute system should eventually be deprecated in favor of using > predefined roles for everything. Or perhaps the predefined roles should be > converted to role attributes. I couldn't agree more. Apparently it's even confusing to developers, because otherwise (1) we wouldn't have the problem the patch proposes to fix in the first place and (2) I would have immediately been convinced of the value of the patch once it showed up. Since those things didn't happen, this is apparently confusing to (1) whoever wrote the code that this patch fixes and (2) me. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: