Re: pgcon unconference / impact of block size on performance
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgcon unconference / impact of block size on performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoa8WXoiQrgx0ovxR4iwtKAcfj-WfWaHSez4L1nRR7fcAQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pgcon unconference / impact of block size on performance (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgcon unconference / impact of block size on performance
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 7:23 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > This opened a long discussion about possible explanations - I claimed > one of the main factors is the adoption of flash storage, due to pretty > fundamental differences between HDD and SSD systems. But the discussion > concluded with an agreement to continue investigating this, so here's an > attempt to support the claim with some measurements/data. Interesting. I wonder if the fact that x86 machines have a 4kB page size matters here. It seems hard to be sure because it's not something you can really change. But there are a few of your graphs where 4kB spikes up above any higher or lower value, and maybe that's why? -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: