Re: savepoint commit performance
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: savepoint commit performance |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+Tgmoa8DGNupF2urdYRF06WQ-0mfygO+TCB_JySp4_KoB7JwA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | savepoint commit performance (Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: savepoint commit performance
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net> wrote: > This patch: > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=605 > > Seems to have been after thoughts, and back burner stuff, and forgotten > about... > > Has it already been commit? > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2011-07/msg00206.php > > Oh, wait, nevermind, it was revoked and reworked: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-07/msg01041.php > > but that was posted Jul 19, 2011. And the Patch linked from commitfest is > Jun 6, 2011. So is that an old patch? Or a new patch? > > I'm confused. As far as I can see, Simon stated that he would revert it but never did so. Perhaps we should go do that... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: