Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoa7oVYTkDEAzZz2Zw2mwz49orRWV4vYPr6EZ2MP7cioRQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Not really -- it's a bit slower actually in a synthetic case measuring > exactly the slowed-down case. See > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD__OugK12ZqMWWjZiM-YyuD1y8JmMy6x9YEctNiF3rPp6hy0g@mail.gmail.com > I bet in normal cases it's unnoticeable. If WARM flies, then it's going > to provide a larger improvement than is lost to this. Hmm, that test case isn't all that synthetic. It's just a single column bulk update, which isn't anything all that crazy, and 5-10% isn't nothing. I'm kinda surprised it made that much difference, though. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: