Re: pgsql: Improve autovacuum logging for aggressive andanti-wraparound ru
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgsql: Improve autovacuum logging for aggressive andanti-wraparound ru |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+Tgmoa7JJG0g2rCR=m8wXzExZDBpHPo04a5FyV-EotknVDONg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Improve autovacuum logging for aggressive andanti-wraparound ru (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Improve autovacuum logging for aggressive and anti-wraparound ru
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2018-Sep-13, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Improve autovacuum logging for aggressive and anti-wraparound runs >> >> A log message was being generated when log_min_duration is reached for >> autovacuum on a given relation to indicate if it was an aggressive run, >> and missed the point of mentioning if it is doing an anti-wrapround >> run. The log message generated is improved so as one, both or no extra >> details are added depending on the option set. > > Hmm, can a for-wraparound vacuum really not be aggressive? I think one > of those four cases is really dead code. My first question was whether TWO of them were dead code ... isn't an aggressive vacuum to prevent wraparound, and a vacuum to prevent wraparound aggressive? I can't figure out what this is giving us that we didn't have before. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: