Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoa7EMBgWWyJVN1KRZJdeq2zJVd6+X_yRJn9MMLUQGV+rQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > For the default partition we are only setting bound->content[0] to > default, but content for others key > attributes are not initialized. But later in the code, if the content > of the first key is RANGE_DATUM_DEFAULT then it should not access the > next content, but I see there are some exceptions. Which can access > uninitialized value? I think somebody should do some testing of the existing code with valgrind. And then apply the list-partitioning patch and this patch, and do some more testing with valgrind. It seems to be really easy to miss these uninitialized access problems during code review. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: