Re: [idea] more aggressive join pushdown on postgres_fdw
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [idea] more aggressive join pushdown on postgres_fdw |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoa665CLwbVgRR=M9-PZCTtO+ckixPz+6JcZ+Mu82LoJaQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [idea] more aggressive join pushdown on postgres_fdw (Shigeru HANADA <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Shigeru HANADA <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com> wrote: > 2015/06/05 6:43、Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> のメール: >> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> wrote: >> Neat idea. This ties into something I've thought about and mentioned >> before: what if the innerrel is local, but there's a replicated copy >> on the remote server? Perhaps both cases are worth thinking about at >> some point. > > Interesting, but I’m not sure that I understood the situation. > > Here which kind of replication method do you mean? I guess you assume some kind of per-table replication such as Slony-Ior materialized views with postgres_fdw or dblink, in postgres_fdw case. If this assumption is correct, we need amapping between a local ordinary table and a foreign table which points remote replicated table. Right. I was thinking of BDR, in particular, or some future future in-core feature which might be similar, but Slony could do the same thing. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: