Re: separate initdb -A options for local and host
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: separate initdb -A options for local and host |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+Tgmoa5ifQfW7EchZCk1XSRgJ2Uh2P6Zf5qP9KJ2NubYi7iXQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: separate initdb -A options for local and host (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > On lör, 2011-11-26 at 01:20 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> I think it would be useful to have separate initdb -A options for local >> and host entries. In 9.1, we went out of our way to separate the "peer" >> and "ident" methods, but we have moved the confusion into the initdb -A >> option, where "ident" sometimes means "peer", and "peer" sometimes means >> "ident". Moreover, having separate options would allow what I think >> would be a far more common use case, namely having local "peer" and host >> something other than "ident", such as "md5". >> >> I'm thinking, we could keep the existing -A option, but add long options >> such as --auth-local and --auth-host, to specify more detail. > > Here is a patch that implements exactly that. I reviewed this patch. It looks OK to me. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: