Re: Limiting the number of parameterized indexpaths created
От
Robert Haas
Тема
Re: Limiting the number of parameterized indexpaths created
Дата
Msg-id
CA+Tgmoa5QYostcWmhGAvOsDSpLL6yCjtdQeR3YJ2LiGgLo+_3Q@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Limiting the number of parameterized indexpaths created Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Limiting the number of parameterized indexpaths created Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Limiting the number of parameterized indexpaths created Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Limiting the number of parameterized indexpaths created Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Limiting the number of parameterized indexpaths created Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Limiting the number of parameterized indexpaths created Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Limiting the number of parameterized indexpaths created Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Limiting the number of parameterized indexpaths created Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Limiting the number of parameterized indexpaths created Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Limiting the number of parameterized indexpaths created Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Limiting the number of parameterized indexpaths created Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> I looked into the complaint of unreasonable planner runtime in bug #7626, >>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2012-10/msg00232.php > >> You know, when I read this, my first thought was ... why is this an >> exponential relationship instead of a linear one? > > Because it's considering *combinations* of outer relations for a > parameterized scan. For instance consider an index on t(a,b) > and a query > WHERE t.a = x.c1 AND t.b = y.c2 > There are three different parameterized paths we could create: one > relying on x only, one relying on y only, one relying on both. Sure, but that example is different from the test case provided in the bug report. I agree that here we need to try paths parameterized by a, b, or both a and b. Things might blow up multiplicatively, because we have join clauses referencing both t.a and t.b. But they shouldn't blow up exponentially, because each of t.a and t.b can only be parameterized by ONE thing (I think). And in the example in the bug report, only one column of the table (foo.id) is mentioned. foo.id can be driven by ag1.aid OR ag2.aid OR ag3.aid OR ..., but not more than one of those at a time. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления