Re: Discrepancy in 9.1 Documentation on CREATE ROLE
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Discrepancy in 9.1 Documentation on CREATE ROLE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoa5P5epGBLeMPopk+6sH03cwiwUrB9ZnPEk4rc7Sp7UdA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Discrepancy in 9.1 Documentation on CREATE ROLE (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Discrepancy in 9.1 Documentation on CREATE ROLE
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: >> Robert Haas wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >>>> Robert Haas wrote: >>>>> I wonder if we ought to consider removing CREATEUSER and NOCREATEUSER >>>>> as synonyms for SUPERUSER and NOSUPERUSER. ?It looks like that change >>>>> was made in 8.1, which is now EOL. > >>>> Agreed. ?They might still appear in dumps so maybe just remove >>>> documentation about them. > >>> They shouldn't appear in any non-ancient dumps, and we don't guarantee >>> that those will work anyway: you're suppose to pg_dump with the new >>> version of pg_dump, running against the old cluster. > >> Well, we have pg_dump support for 7.3 dumps (2002), so I don't see a >> reason to remove that capability. Now, if we want to remove that >> support, then it would make sense to remove the rest, but I think people >> are still assuming old dumps can load, especially if they have the dump >> but not the 7.3 server installed. > > I think removing them from the docs but continuing to accept them makes > sense. We do still hear from people migrating from 7.4 or older, and > it's not always going to be practical for them to make a dump with a > newer pg_dump. Personally, I loathe all that is undocumented. But that might just be me. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: