Re: Use outerPlanState() consistently in executor code
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Use outerPlanState() consistently in executor code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoa3stUWTuXtV5pDQS8N4JmMWUeMsaA23DZ=U4KTDLQ77g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Use outerPlanState() consistently in executor code (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Use outerPlanState() consistently in executor code
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 08:46:55AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Qingqing Zhou >> <zhouqq.postgres@gmail.com> wrote: >> > In executor context, outerPlanState(node) is the same as >> > node->ss.ps.lefttree. We follow this in most places except a few. This >> > patch clean up the outliers and might save us a few instructions by >> > removing indirection. >> > >> > Most of changes are trivial. Except I take out an outerPlan nullable >> > check in grouping iterator - as a it surely has a left child. >> >> I don't see any particular reason not to do this. >> >> The patch is weird, though. If I open it with "less", I get binary >> garbage. My Mac's TextEdit app opens it OK though. > > The patch is encoded as utf-16le, and has MSDOS newlines, ^M. I don't mind the MSDOS newlines, but the UTF-16le bit is inconvenient. UTF-8 would be much better, so I don't have to figure out how to convert. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: