Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoa3eiv-H7oR50Qp8FipUhyg+9=7KVDVgWakE54QjtWuZg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 6:11 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > slot that's compatible with the "target" table. You can get compatible > slot callbakcs by calling table_slot_callbacks(), or directly create one > by calling table_gimmegimmeslot() (likely to be renamed :)). Hmm. I assume the issue is that table_createslot() was already taken for another purpose, so then when you needed another callback you went with table_givemeslot(), and then when you needed a third API to do something in the same area the best thing available was table_gimmeslot(), which meant that the fourth API could only be table_gimmegimmeslot(). Does that sound about right? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: