Re: Parallel Seq Scan
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoa3CK_pukunWR3H98BeN-sS9uRTEavWNmh1XP3i3=w-yA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parallel Seq Scan (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Parallel Seq Scan
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> I was thinking about this idea: >> >> 1. Add a parallel_aware flag to each plan. > > Okay, so shall we add it in generic Plan node or to specific plan nodes > like SeqScan, IndexScan, etc. To me, it appears that parallelism is > a node specific property, so we should add it to specific nodes and > for now as we are parallelising seq scan, so we can add this flag in > SeqScan node. What do you say? I think it should go in the Plan node itself. Parallel Append is going to need a way to test whether a node is parallel-aware, and there's nothing simpler than if (plan->parallel_aware). That makes life simple for EXPLAIN, too. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: