Re: New pgbench functions are misnamed
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New pgbench functions are misnamed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoa2fOWPdyeFahKbsi8e2hmHWpW=zM-eAF_x6qj-Q36CVA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | New pgbench functions are misnamed (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: New pgbench functions are misnamed
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I noticed that commit 7e137f846 added functions named max() and min() > to pgbench's expression syntax. Unfortunately, these functions have > zilch to do with what max() and min() do in SQL. They're actually more > like the greatest() and least() server-side functions. > > While I can't imagine that we'd ever want to implement true aggregates > in pgbench expressions, it still seems like this is a recipe for > confusion. Shouldn't we rename these to greatest() and least()? Yeah, that's probably a good idea. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: