Re: RFC: extensible planner state

On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 11:41 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > Done now. Here's a rebase of the rest, plus I tweaked the GEQO patch
> > to try to avoid a compiler warning that cfbot was complaining about.
>
> I'm good with the v7 patch set, except for the complaint I raised
> previously that we really ought to have more than zero documentation
> for planner()'s parameters.  If you don't care to write such text,
> attached is a cut at it.

Oh, nice, thanks! I'm going to be on vacation the rest of this week so
I plan to deal with this next week. However, if you feel like
committing it before then, please feel free.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com