Re: pgbench more operators & functions
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgbench more operators & functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoa0zp4A+S+KosaV4QfDz-wA56vLpH8me86rmpsnkvWc2w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgbench more operators & functions (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgbench more operators & functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: >> Attached version changes: >> - removes C operators not present in psql >> - document operators one per line > > Moved to next CF with same status: "Ready for committer". I think it's pretty clear that this patch is not Ready for Committer, because there's no consensus that we want this, and like Tom and Stephen, I'd argue that there are large parts of it we don't want. The documentation in the latest patch version mentions XOR and IF which we definitely don't want because there is no similar thing in SQL, but in addition to that, I don't think much of an argument has been made that any of this is actually useful. I'm skeptical about the notion that giving pgbench a vast repertoire of mathematical functions is a good idea. What does that actually let us do that is useful and not possible today? I'm happy to see pgbench made better in a variety of ways, but I don't really see why that particular thing is useful. Perhaps I'm just missing something. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: