Re: RLS feature has been committed

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> The CommitFests were never meant to restrict when a committer could
> commit a patch.  The point of the CFs was to give committers time *off*
> from committing patches.  If a committer wants to commit something
> completely outside of the CF process, they are welcome to, as long as it
> receives adequate review.

Agreed.

> So if there's an argument here, it's whether or not the committed RLS
> patch was adequately reviewed (and if not, if it should be reverted),
> not whether it should have been in the CF or not.

The point here is precisely that nobody other than the authors
reviewed it, and that I specifically asked Stephen to hold off commit
until the next CommitFest because I did not want to drop everything to
review a patch that was posted mid-CommitFest over other patches that
were timely submitted.  Stephen took the technical content that
appeared in that same email, incorporated into the patch, and
committed it shortly thereafter.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company