Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+Tgmoa065y_UnXeff4AjL7H0tqzs4fw2Z5LSjvgAMvb8OxVHA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 9:08 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote: > > Kinda makes me question the wisdom of starting to depend on NSS. When openssl > > docs are vastly outshining a library's, that library really should start to > > ask itself some hard questions. Yeah, OpenSSL is very poor, so being worse is not good. > Sadly, there is that. While this is not a new problem, Mozilla has been making > some very weird decisions around NSS governance as of late. Another data point > is the below thread from libcurl: > > https://curl.se/mail/lib-2022-01/0120.html I would really, really like to have an alternative to OpenSSL for PG. I don't know if this is the right thing, though. If other people are dropping support for it, that's a pretty bad sign IMHO. Later in the thread it says OpenLDAP have dropped support for it already as well. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: