On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> ISTM that the sentence "as remote constraints are not locally known" is
>> somewhat confusing, because check constrains on remote tables can be
>> defined locally in 9.5. How about "unique constraints or exclusion
>> constraints on remote tables are not locally known"? Attached is a
>> patch for that.
>
> Makes sense to me.
Me, too. Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company