Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sepgsql: Support for new post-ALTER access hook.
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sepgsql: Support for new post-ALTER access hook. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZzbCPwbcsV4s7kt8jRLyMdHERWBBFCY7BiGfGdYQcBMQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sepgsql: Support for new post-ALTER access hook. (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sepgsql: Support for new post-ALTER access hook.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > Perhaps something along the lines of: > > "When a CREATE FUNCTION command is executed, the install permission > will be checked to determine whether the LEAKPROOF attribute was > present. This permission will also be checked when the user tries to > apply the LEAKPROOF attribute using the ALTER FUNCTION command." > > I'm not sure what the last part is actually describing ("with setattr > permission on the function being altered."), so I'm not sure how that > should be read. It doesn't help that I'm not familiar with SELinux > terms. Right, so what it's trying to say is: whenever you modify an object, we check whether you've got {setattr} permission for that object and disallow the operation if not. However, for some operations on some object types, {setattr} is necessary but not sufficient. The paragraph is recapping, for various cases, which operations require additional permissions, and what those additional things are. > I was really just thinking of CREATE and LEAKPROOF, but I'm not sure > "CREATE" should be in there anyway. create here is referring to the sepgsql permission, not the SQL command, so it's correct as-is. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: