Re: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZybB5k7J01LeTSHX9bO2R+52mBwU_SudQRpm-P3SQu_g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE ("Erik Rijkers" <er@xs4all.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote: > On Sun, February 19, 2012 06:27, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote: >>> pg_restore ignores environment variable PGDATABASE. >> >> What exactly do you mean by "ignores"? pg_restore prints results to >> standard output unless a database name is specified. AFAIK, there's >> no syntax to say "I want a direct-to-database restore to whatever you >> think the default database is". > > That's right, and that seems contradictory with: > > "This utility [pg_restore], like most other PostgreSQL utilities, also uses the environment > variables supported by libpq (see Section 31.13)." > > as pg_restore does 'ignore' (for want of a better word) PGDATABASE. > > But I think I can conclude from your reply that that behaviour is indeed intentional. It is, because we want there to be a way of converting a custom or tar format archive back to text. I think that probably works out for the best anyway, since pg_restore is a sufficiently dangerous operation that you want to be darn sure you're not doing it on the wrong database. dropdb also requires a database name, while createdb does not, for similar reasons... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: