Re: Race condition between hot standby and restoring a FPW
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Race condition between hot standby and restoring a FPW |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZurW5+zY4y6eM3q3sW2k7oETwZxq_sLZgMRGjAH9MOXw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Race condition between hot standby and restoring a FPW (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Race condition between hot standby and restoring a
FPW
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote: > 2. When ReadBufferExtended doesn't find the page in cache, it returns the > buffer in !BM_VALID state (i.e. still in I/O in-progress state). Require the > caller to call a second function, after locking the page, to finish the I/O. This seems like a reasonable approach. If you tilt your head the right way, zeroing a page and restoring a backup block are the same thing: either way, you want to "read" the block into shared buffers without actually reading it, so that you can overwrite the prior contents with something else. So, you could fix this by adding a new mode, RBM_OVERWRITE, and passing the new page contents as an additional argument to ReadBufferExtended, which would then memcpy() that data into place where RBM_ZERO calls MemSet() to zero it. I'm not sure whether we want to complicate the API that way, though. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: