Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZuA=Fb26D36v3eErWRJXLXJTejO=c=jF36R4T0NPaheA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: > And, also I added regression test cases to detect these code paths, > because some of object types does not cover the case when it was > dropped. These regression tests seem busted to me. First, I applied the part 2 patch. The regression tests failed. Then, I applied the part 3 patch. Then they passed. So far so good. Then, I took the regression test portion of the part 2 and part 3 patches and applied just those. That also fails. Can we come up with a set of regression tests that: - passes on unmodified master - still passes with the part 2 patch applied - also passes with both the part 2 and part 3 patches applied AIUI, this patch isn't supposed to be changing any behavior, just consolidating the code. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: