Re: Parallel Seq Scan
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZtb3aBBoOX2rLBnTMWo1SLwsLp5hAPQkHapDEgHNzuBA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parallel Seq Scan (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Parallel Seq Scan
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > The number of shared buffers hit could be different across different runs > because the read sequence of parallel workers can't be guaranteed, also > I don't think same is even guaranteed for Seq Scan node, The number of hits could be different. However, it seems like any sequential scan, parallel or not, should have a number of accesses (hit + read) equal to the size of the relation. Not sure if that's what is happening here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: