Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZrHwE+McQtCG+EQdbHPt+a3np=-18Bf2KM=tQUbYDJ2g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:50 AM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > Rebased patches attached. Because Dilip complained earlier today about > clauses of the form (const op var) not causing partition-pruning, I've > added code to commute the clause where it is required. Some other > previously mentioned limitations remain -- no handling of OR clauses, no > elimination of redundant clauses for given partitioning column, etc. > > A note about 0001: this patch overlaps with > 0003-Canonical-partition-scheme.patch from the partitionwise-join patch > series that Ashutosh Bapat posted yesterday [1]. It doesn't merely overlap; it's obviously a derivative work, and the commit message in your version should credit all the authors. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: