Re: asynchronous and vectorized execution
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: asynchronous and vectorized execution |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZosJxLJp9EYovTS_2omU6NRNyz1o=nto81YCFRwNfFYg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: asynchronous and vectorized execution (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: asynchronous and vectorized execution
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > That seems to suggest that we need to restructure how we get to calling > fmgr functions, before worrying about the actual fmgr call. Any ideas on how to do that? ExecMakeFunctionResultNoSets() isn't really doing a heck of a lot. Changing FuncExprState to use an array rather than a linked list to store its arguments might help some. We could also consider having an optimized path that skips the fn_strict stuff if we can somehow deduce that no NULLs can occur in this context, but that's a lot of work and new infrastructure. I feel like maybe there's something higher-level we could do that would help more, but I don't know what it is. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: