Re: new heapcheck contrib module
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: new heapcheck contrib module |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZo6BHLgZLW5n6ua72GtuMqDieYDhQRpUcFYm9rp-veDQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: new heapcheck contrib module ("Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: new heapcheck contrib module
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 2:10 PM Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > I don't think so. ISTM It's the same problem of xmax<relfrozenxid actually, just hidden behind detoasing. > Our regular heap_check was checking xmin\xmax invariants for tables, but failed to recognise the problem in toast (whiletoast was accessible until CLOG truncation). The code can (and should, and I think does) refrain from looking up XIDs that are out of the range thought to be valid -- but how do you propose that it avoid looking up XIDs that ought to have clog data associated with them despite being >= relfrozenxid and < nextxid? TransactionIdDidCommit() does not have a suppress-errors flag, adding one would be quite invasive, yet we cannot safely perform a significant number of checks without knowing whether the inserting transaction committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: