Re: [HACKERS] Nested Wait Events?

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> There's too many "I"s in that para. I've not presented this as a
> defect, nor is there any reason to believe this post is aimed at you
> personally.

Well, actually, there is.  You said in your original post that
something was "not correct" and something else was "not handled".
That sounds like a description of a defect to me.  If that wasn't how
you meant it, fine.

> I'm letting Hackers know that I've come across two problems and I see
> more. I'm good with accepting reduced scope in return for performance,
> but we should be allowed to discuss what limitations that imposes
> without rancour.

I'm not mad.  I thought you were.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company