Re: [HACKERS] ALTER SYSTEM for pg_hba.conf
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] ALTER SYSTEM for pg_hba.conf |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmoZnFbKCx87fSqY8dAmHQo+maMHJhCqXPBHcVU-+nhrHWg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [HACKERS] ALTER SYSTEM for pg_hba.conf (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > Generally speaking, an ALTER DATABASE is unlikely to make the cluster > fail to start. To be clear, I've only seen 1 or 2 cases and I'm not > sure if, in those cases, they even fully understood how much can be > changed through ALTER DATABASE or ALTER ROLE. OK. > My goal in those cases (and others where I come across installations > with a lot of superusers) is typically to try and educate them as to > just how close a superuser is to the unix user and recommend that they > reconsider how they handle access privileges in the system (in > particular, to try and get them to not have so many superusers and > instead use other ways to give people access to what they need). Makes sense. > Of course, that tends to lead into things like "well, how do I make sure > that user X has read rights on every table, always" or "how do I give > someone the ability to terminate runaway queries that another user > started." We've made progress there, but there's more to do still. I agree! -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: