Re: pg_regress not waiting for postmaster to stop
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_regress not waiting for postmaster to stop |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZn-8DcZ5EvQd=PJQeGPLeATpv7GjJBy9TG+4FOoU8ahA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_regress not waiting for postmaster to stop (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > In pg_regress.c, there is the following code: > static void > stop_postmaster(void) > { > if (postmaster_running) > { > /* We use pg_ctl to issue the kill and wait for stop */ > char buf[MAXPGPATH * 2]; > int r; > > /* On Windows, system() seems not to force fflush, so... */ > fflush(stdout); > fflush(stderr); > > snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), > "\"%s%spg_ctl\" stop -D \"%s/data\" > -w -s -m fast", > bindir ? bindir : "", > bindir ? "/" : "", > temp_instance); > > Except if I am missing something, the comment mentions that we should > wait for the stop but there is no -w switch in the command of pg_ctl. > Doesn't the patch attached make sense? Do we need to wait, or is failing to wait harmless? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: