Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZkgifHN+LxFVehjsU0q=v7zfz2usM6gO6BVbbY4SR08g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> What about creating a new, single-purpose database in the source >> cluster and then removing it again after we're done? > > That is not a problem --- I can easily use template1. Huh? You just said upthread that you didn't want to use template1 because you didn't want to modify the template database. I think the point is that if you're doing something to the database that someone might object to, you oughtn't be doing it to the postgres database either. You should create a database just for pg_upgrade's use and install its crap in there. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: