Re: Moving of INT64_FORMAT to c.h
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Moving of INT64_FORMAT to c.h |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZisf0cVNxUfBegqnUxAS2ZwpTiR2HcMksr0m0kxOvyVw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Moving of INT64_FORMAT to c.h (Steve Singer <steve@ssinger.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Moving of INT64_FORMAT to c.h
Re: Moving of INT64_FORMAT to c.h |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Steve Singer <steve@ssinger.info> wrote: > So the header of c.h says "Note that the definitions here are not intended > to be exposed to clients" > but > postgres_fe.h says "This should be the first file included by PostgreSQL > client libraries and" > > Should client programs that live outside the postgres source tree be > including postgres_fe.h ? I have a feeling the answer is no. If the answer > is no, then why does a make install install postgres_fe.h ? I think the answer is yes. > Slonik used to include postgre_fe.h but back in 2011 or so we stopped doing > so because it was causing issues (I think on win32 builds) That seems like something we ought to consider fixing, but obviously we'd need more details. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: