Re: BTMaxItemSize seems to be subtly incorrect
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BTMaxItemSize seems to be subtly incorrect |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZg_V=Z-LAp-Ch6zBf1e6FNcyMTZg+yoN82BEepz4iAoQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BTMaxItemSize seems to be subtly incorrect (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: BTMaxItemSize seems to be subtly incorrect
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 7:44 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > FWIW I don't see much difference between borrowing special space and > adding something to BTPageOpaqueData. If anything I'd prefer the > latter. I think this discussion will take us too far afield from the topic of this thread, so I'll just say here that wouldn't solve the problem I was trying to tackle. > Here's why: BTMaxItemSizeNoHeapTid() is actually what BTMaxItemSize() > looked like prior to Postgres 12. So the limit on internal pages never > changed, even in Postgres 12. There was no separate leaf page limit > prior to 12. Only the rules on the leaf level ever really changed. Yeah, I noticed that, too. Are you going to code up a patch? -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: