Re: Discrepancy in 9.1 Documentation on CREATE ROLE
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Discrepancy in 9.1 Documentation on CREATE ROLE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZfSrdGXfvk72A=+oYhTUQpnDjaYtM6wYTjqnTohociwg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Discrepancy in 9.1 Documentation on CREATE ROLE (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> I think removing them from the docs but continuing to accept them makes >>> sense. We do still hear from people migrating from 7.4 or older, and >>> it's not always going to be practical for them to make a dump with a >>> newer pg_dump. > >> Personally, I loathe all that is undocumented. But that might just be me. > > Well, could we bury the documentation in some corner where newbies > wouldn't find it? Maybe. At this point I'm inclined to think that what I already did (turn the words "CREATE USER" into a link) is probably sufficient given that we have only a single report of this being confusing. I didn't even back-patch it, since I can't remember any similar reports in the past. If it keeps coming up, then we might need to get out a bigger hammer, but my reason for wanting to get rid of the options was less about avoiding confusion than about thinking that they're likely totally obsolete and worthless at this point; given that you and Bruce disagree, I'd be inclined to just keep them for now and see if anyone else complains. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: