Re: pgbench -f and vacuum

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
>> It's says:
>>
>> starting vacuum.... ERROR: blah
>> ERROR: blah
>> ERROR: blah
>> done
>>
>> And then continues on.  Sure, that's not the greatest error reporting
>> output ever, but what do you expect from pgbench?  I think it's clear
>> enough what's going on there.  The messages appear in quick
>> succession, because it doesn't take very long to notice that the table
>> isn't there, so it's not like you are sitting there going "wait,
>> what?".
>>
>> If we're going to add something, I like your second suggestion
>> "(ignoring this error and continuing anyway)" more than the first one.
>> Putting "ignoring:" before the thing you plan to ignore will be
>> confusing, I think.
>
> +1 to adding "(ignoring this error and continuing anyway)" and
> committing this.

You want to take care of that?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company