Re: Regression tests vs existing users in an installation
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regression tests vs existing users in an installation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZf-TodYQJz91bLm8WLsEefNhdJJfM1wn+AnYehadDwoA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Regression tests vs existing users in an installation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Regression tests vs existing users in an installation
Re: Regression tests vs existing users in an installation |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I'm coming to the conclusion that the only thing that will make this > materially better in the long run is automatic enforcement of a convention > about what role names may be created in the regression tests. See my > response to Stephen just now for a concrete proposal. We could also do this by loading a C module during the regression tests, which seems maybe less ugly than adding a GUC. I don't particularly like your suggestion of spooky action at a distance between force_parallel_mode and regression_test_mode. That just seems kooky. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: