Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZeiJ7oh3O4kQ9aS2ti5c=90tyHO98TKtujWcjBGa4wzg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I'm not sure why this feature of automatically picking up matching > indexes even exists. Is it for some specific workflows or upgrade > scenarios? It's kind of a surprising feature in a way. It allows you to avoid building a new indexes unnecessarily when attaching a partition. > The catalog representations of partitioned tables and partitioned > indexes are completely different, which may or may not be desirable. How so? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: