Re: NUMERIC size
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: NUMERIC size |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZcNyWUBFVUUAGostd-EPsfecdVHY1F+ZRxziOuwfFO7g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | NUMERIC size (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >> Numeric values are physically stored without any extra leading or >> trailing zeroes. Thus, the declared precision and scale of a column >> are maximums, not fixed allocations. (In this sense the numeric type >> is more akin to varchar(n) than to char(n).) The actual storage >> requirement is two bytes for each group of four decimal digits, >> plus five to eight bytes overhead. > > The last sentence of the above seems not to be correct. Because, > thanks to the reduction of NUMERIC size (committed in 9.1), its header > size is three, five or eight for now. Attached patch fixes this. Nice catch. Committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: